DOOMSDAY COUNTER

predictions · evidence · amendments

2012: a calendar cycle is not a Maya apocalypse

The mistake is not the calendar date. It is the added claim about what that date means. NASA’s explanation separates the cycle boundary from a promised global catastrophe.

A calendar turning over is a familiar kind of event. It does not require a civilisation to have predicted the destruction of the world. This entry keeps the modern claim separate and avoids assigning one view to the Maya as a whole.

Sources & version history

← Back to the ledger · Suggest a sourced correction