UAP & UFO Case Files: Tic Tac, GoFast and Beyond
A short video can hide a large question. A witness can supply a vivid account while leaving the measurements missing. Start with the puzzle, then open the material behind it.
2004 · Pacific
Nimitz / Tic Tac
A pilot’s close visual account, shipboard radar reports and a later infrared recording have become one famous story. Reconstructing it starts by keeping those pieces separate.
2015 · Atlantic
GoFast
A target appears to skim the ocean at extraordinary speed. NASA’s geometry example and AARO’s later assessment both challenge that visual impression without definitively identifying the object.
2015 · Navy recording
GIMBAL
A rotating infrared image invites a question about both the target and the camera. The 2020 release statement establishes the Navy recording’s provenance. It does not supply a complete explanation of the broader encounter. We have not reproduced an optical analysis of this clip.
2013 · Puerto Rico
Aguadilla
Was an apparent split or water crossing a physical maneuver, or the result of viewing geometry? SCU’s response to AARO asks for track data and methodological clarification. This is a specific reconstruction dispute; the underlying assumptions matter more than a dramatic freeze-frame.
SCU’s response · AARO report — direct PDF access was unavailable in our check
15 February 2023 · witness statement
USS Jackson
Alexandro Wiggins reports a luminous object emerging from the ocean, joining three others and departing in synchrony. His September 2025 submission describes supporting sensors and published imagery. This is his account in a personal capacity, not a Navy finding of alien origin.
2003–2005 · several reported events
Vandenberg’s red square
Jeffrey Nuccetelli describes one event he personally witnessed and others he investigated or learned about from colleagues. The October 2003 red-square report belongs to other observers. Combining the incidents would create an encounter that no single witness described.
Summer 2012 · witness account
The Langley triangle
Dylan Borland describes a silent triangular object near his barracks and a subsequent rapid ascent. His recalled dimensions and phone interference are parts of his account, not independently calibrated measurements. His separate program and conduct allegations need separate corroboration.
Public submission · alleged program
Immaculate Constellation
This is an authentication question rather than a single sighting. Michael Shellenberger’s 2024 submission describes an alleged imagery program and includes the Department of Defense’s denial of a program with that name. Matthew Brown’s later account is another source to trace, not automatic independent corroboration.
Program proposal · official assessment
KONA BLUE
AARO’s historical assessment describes a proposed Department of Homeland Security special-access activity that was never approved. A proposal can be real paperwork without its proposed technology having been demonstrated. Detailed funding or operational claims require the underlying records.
AARO historical report — indexed conclusion checked; direct full-text access unavailable · Released proposal records
December 1980 · United Kingdom
Rendlesham Forest
Airmen investigating lights, Charles Halt’s later outing and his “Unexplained Lights” memo form the archival starting point. The National Archives guide points to DEFE 24/1512 and DEFE 24/1948/1. Later retellings need comparison with those earlier records.
19 September 1976 · Iran
The Tehran report
The NSA catalog identifies a Joint Chiefs of Staff report about the sighting. That establishes an original military-report route. We have not inspected the complete underlying PDF in this review, so exact maneuvers and equipment-failure claims are not reproduced here.
19 May 1986 · Brazil
The “Official Night of UFOs”
Brazil’s National Archives provides a route into reports and recollections of the 1986 encounters. An archived pilot narrative is a useful starting point; exact speeds and tracks require reading the specific original Portuguese record rather than plotting a later retelling.
Ongoing observation project · Norway
Hessdalen’s lights
An instrumented valley offers something different from a single legendary encounter. Project Hessdalen links cameras, reports and research. Its 1 September 2026 “Skipping Orb” account compares a witness report with a small camera image; identifying a light in both does not establish its cause.
Historical research routes
Blue Book, Carter, JAL 1628 and Project 1794
The US National Archives points to sighting reports, aviation material and a human-engineered disc-shaped design. These are different kinds of records. A collection’s UFO label describes its subject, not a finding that everything in it came from another world.
Choose a useful next question
For a recording, ask how the camera moved and whether range was measured. For testimony, ask which details the speaker personally observed. For a proposed program, ask what was authorized and what was actually demonstrated.
The entries above have different levels of review. A catalog route is identified as a catalog route; a disputed reconstruction remains a dispute. The detailed Tic Tac and GoFast files show how those distinctions change a story.
Source review: 16 October 2026. Fourteen case and archive trails are included. Some entries are starting points for research, not completed technical investigations; their limits are stated beside the link.
Found an original document or a correction? Send the claim, its date and the source to doomsday@doomsdaycounter.com.